eu-charter

EU Charter of Fundamental Rights

Article 7 - Respect for private and family life

Article 7 - Respect for private and family life

Everyone has the right to respect for his or her private and family life, home and communications.

  • Text:

    The rights guaranteed in Article 7 correspond to those guaranteed by Article 8 of the ECHR. To take account of developments in technology the word "correspondence" has been replaced by "communications".
    In accordance with Article 52(3), the meaning and scope of this right are the same as those of the corresponding article of the ECHR. Consequently, the limitations which may legitimately be imposed on this right are the same as those allowed by Article 8 of the ECHR:

    "1. Everyone has the right to respect for his private and family life, his home and his correspondence.
    2. There shall be no interference by a public authority with the exercise of this right except such as is in accordance with the law and is necessary in a democratic society in the interests of national security, public safety or the economic well-being of the country, for the prevention of disorder or crime, for the protection of health or morals, or for the protection of the rights and freedoms of others."

    Source:
    Official Journal of the European Union C 303/17 - 14.12.2007
    Preamble - Explanations relating to the Charter of Fundamental Rights:
    These explanations were originally prepared under the authority of the Praesidium of the Convention which drafted the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union. Although they do not as such have the status of law, they are a valuable tool of interpretation intended to clarify the provisions of the Charter.
  • Nexans France and Nexans v European Commission
    Decision date:
    Deciding body type:
    Court of Justice of the European Union
    Deciding body:
    Court (Second Chamber)
    Type:
    Decision
    Policy area:
    ECLI (European case law identifier):
    ECLI:EU:C:2020:571
  • Plaintiff: Ž.B. Respondent/interested party: Civil Registry Division of Vilnius City Municipal Administration Authority issuing the opinion in the case: The State Commission of the Lithuanian Language
    Decision date:
    Deciding body type:
    National Court/Tribunal
    Deciding body:
    Vilnius city district court
    Type:
    Decision
    Policy area:
    ECLI (European case law identifier):
  • Ž.B. v. Civil Registry Division of Vilnius City Municipal Administration
    Decision date:
    Deciding body type:
    National Court/Tribunal
    Deciding body:
    Type:
    Decision
    Policy area:
    ECLI (European case law identifier):
  • The commercial MIRACLIA TELECOMUNICACIONES, S.L. against the STATE ADMINISTRATION.
    Decision date:
    Deciding body type:
    National Court/Tribunal
    Deciding body:
    The Spanish Supreme Court
    Type:
    Decision
    Policy area:
    ECLI (European case law identifier):
  • European Commission v Hungary.
    Decision date:
    Deciding body type:
    Court of Justice of the European Union
    Deciding body:
    Court (Grand Chamber)
    Type:
    Decision
    Policy area:
    ECLI (European case law identifier):
    ECLI:EU:C:2020:476
  • Mr. … v. State of Luxembourg (anonymised judgment)
    Decision date:
    Deciding body type:
    National Court/Tribunal
    Deciding body:
    Higher Administrative Court of the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg
    Type:
    Decision
    Policy area:
    ECLI (European case law identifier):
  • Mr T/France
    Decision date:
    Deciding body type:
    National Court/Tribunal
    Deciding body:
    Court of Cassation
    Type:
    Decision
    Policy area:
    ECLI (European case law identifier):
    ECLI:FR:CCASS:2020:CR00434
  • Nexans France and Nexans v European Commission
    Decision date:
    Deciding body type:
    Court of Justice of the European Union
    Deciding body:
    Advocate General
    Type:
    Opinion
    Policy area:
    ECLI (European case law identifier):
    ECLI:EU:C:2020:207
  • Dwyer vs. The Commissioner of An Garda Siochana, Minister for Communications, Energy and Natural Resources, Ireland and Attorney General
    Decision date:
    Deciding body type:
    National Court/Tribunal
    Deciding body:
    Supreme Court
    Type:
    Decision
    Policy area:
    ECLI (European case law identifier):
  • Appeal for unconstitutionality filed by more than fifty members of the Confederal Parliamentary Group of Unidos Podemos-En Comú Podem-En Marea in the Congress of Deputies (the Spanish National Parliament), against Law 5/2018, of 11 June, amending Law 1/2000, of 7 January, on civil proceedings, in relation to the illegal occupation of housing
    Decision date:
    Deciding body type:
    National Court/Tribunal
    Deciding body:
    The Constitutional Court
    Type:
    Policy area:
    ECLI (European case law identifier):
    ECLI:ES:TC:2019:32

0 results found

0 results found

0 results found