Tietosuoja

Data protection rules protect privacy and prevent personal information from misuse. When the general data protection regulation (GDPR) came into force in 2018, it strengthened the role of data protection authorities. These supervisory bodies are the key enforcers of the fundamental right of protection of personal data. This report analyses the challenges they face in the GDPR implementation. The findings complement the European Commission's forthcoming evaluation of the GDPR.

This report provides a partial update on the findings of the 2017 European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (FRA) report Surveillance by intelligence services: Fundamental rights safeguards and remedies in the EU. It was prepared at the request of the European Parliament, which asked FRA to update its 2017 findings to support the work of its committee of inquiry to investigate the use of Pegasus and equivalent surveillance spyware (PEGA).

This document presents data from the FRA Fundamental Rights Survey. It includes data on opinions and experiences of people in the European Union (EU) linked to data protection and technology.

The General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) has applied across the European Union (EU) since 25 May 2018. One year on, this paper looks at how the new regulation has affected the daily work of civil society organisations (CSOs).

Tässä oppaassa selitetään, mitä profilointi on ja millä oikeudellisilla kehyksillä profilointia säännellään. Siinä myös osoitetaan, miksi profiloinnin tekeminen lainmukaisesti on sekä välttämätöntä perusoikeuksien noudattamiseksi että ratkaisevan tärkeää tehokkaan poliisitoiminnan ja rajaturvallisuuden varmistamiseksi. Oppaassa annetaan käytännön ohjeita siitä, miten laitonta profilointia voidaan välttää poliisi- ja rajaturvallisuustoimissa.

Tieto- ja viestintätekniikoiden nopea kehitys on kasvattanut vankan tietosuojan tarvetta. Tämä oikeus
vahvistetaan sekä Euroopan unionin (EU) että Euroopan neuvoston säädöksissä. Tekniikan kehittymisen
myötä esimerkiksi tarkkailun, telepakkokeinojen ja tietojen säilyttämisen rajat ovat väljentyneet asettaen
uusia ja merkittäviä haasteita tämän tärkeän oikeuden turvaamiselle. Tämän käsikirjan tarkoituksena
on tarjota tietosuojaoikeuteen liittyvää tietoa oikeusalan ammattilaisille, jotka eivät ole erikoistuneet
tähän kehittyvään oikeuden alaan.

This report is FRA’s second publication addressing a European Parliament request for in-depth research on the impact of surveillance on fundamental rights. It updates FRA’s 2015 legal analysis on the topic, and supplements that analysis with field-based insights gained from extensive interviews with diverse experts in intelligence and related fields, including its oversight.

In 2006 the EU issued its Data Retention Directive. According to the Directive, EU Member States had to store electronic telecommunications data for at least six months and at most 24 months for investigating, detecting and prosecuting serious crime. In 2016, with an EU legal framework on data retention still lacking, the CJEU further clarified what safeguards are required for data retention to be lawful.This paper looks at amendments to national data retention laws in 2016 after the Digital Rights Ireland judgment.

This report, drafted in response to the European Parliament’s call for thorough research on fundamental rights protection in the context of surveillance, maps and analyses the legal frameworks on surveillance in place in EU Member States.

This summary presents the FRA’s main research conclusions, which are published in full in Access to data protection remedies in EU Member States.

Technological advances make it ever more important to safeguard the right to personal data, which is enshrined in the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union. Data protection violations arise principally from internet‑based activities, direct marketing and video surveillance, perpetrated by, for example, government bodies or financial and health institutions, research by the European Union Fundamental Rights Agency (FRA) shows.

Following a request by the European Parliament on 5 September 2012 for an analysis of the fundamental rights issues associated with the proposed EU data protection reform package, FRA issued its opinion on the draft legislation on 1 October 2012.

When a decision to stop an individual is motivated solely or mainly by virtue of a person's race, ethnicity or religion, this constitutes discriminatory ethnic profiling. Such practices can serve to alienate certain communities in the EU, and in turn can contribute to inefficient policing. The FRA guide aims to help the police address and avoid discriminatory ethnic profiling, and is designed to be used as a tool for more effective policing.

The EU plays a pioneering role in the protection of personal data. The Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU enshrines the right to data protection as an autonomous fundamental right. Despite the underlying importance and centrality of the right to data protection in the EU, many deficiencies are present in the data protection system. This study on data protection identifies deficiencies in the EU Member States.