eu-charter

Karta tad-Drittijiet Fundamentali tal-Unjoni Ewropea

Artikolu 48 - Il-preżunzjoni ta' innoċenza u d-dritt għad-difiża

Artikolu 48 - Il-preżunzjoni ta' innoċenza u d-dritt għad-difiża

1. Kull imputat għandu jkun preżunt innoċenti sakemm jinstab ħati skond il-liġi. 2. Għandu jiġi ggarantit ir-rispett għad-drittijiet tad-difiża ta' kull imputat.

  • Text:

    L-Artikolu 48 huwa l-istess bħall-Artikolu 6(2) u (3) tal-KEDB, li jinqara kif ġej:

    `2. Kull min ikun akkużat b'reat kriminali għandu jiġi meqjus li jkun innoċenti sakemm ma jiġix pruvat ħati skond il-liġi.

    3. Kull min ikun akkużat b'reat kriminali għandu d-drittijiet minimi li ġejjin:

    a) li jkun infurmat minnufih, b'lingwa li jifhem u bid-dettall, dwar in-natura u r-raġuni ta' l-akkuża kontra tiegħu;

    b) li jkollu żmien u faċilitajiet xierqa għall-preparazzjoni tad-difiża tiegħu;

    ċ) li jiddefendi ruħu persunalment jew permezz ta' assistenza legali magħżula minnu stess jew, jekk ma jkollux mezzi biżżejjed li jħallas l-assistenza legali, din għandha tingħata lilu b'xejn meta l-interessi tal-ġustizzja jeħtieġu hekk;

    d) li jeżamina jew li jara li jiġu eżaminati xhieda kontra tiegħu u li jottjeni l-attendenza u l-eżami ta' xhieda favur tiegħu taħt l-istess kundizzjonijiet bħax-xhieda kontra tiegħu;

    e) li jkollu assistenza b'xejn ta' interpretu jekk ma jkunx jifhem jew jitkellem il-lingwa użata fil-qorti`.

    Skond l-Artikolu 52(3), dan id-dritt għandu l-istess sens u ambitu bħad-dritt garantit mill-KEDB.

    Source:
    Il-Ġurnal Uffiċjali ta’ l-Unjoni Ewropea C 303/17 - 14.12.2007
    Preamble - Explanations relating to the Charter of Fundamental Rights:
    Dawn l-ispjegazzjonijiet ġew imħejjija oriġinarjament taħt ir-responsabbiltà tal-Praesidium tal-Konvenzjoni li abbozza l-Karta tad-Drittijiet Fundamentali ta' l-Unjoni Ewropea. Huma ġew aġġornati taħt ir-responsabbiltà tal-Praesidium tal-Konvenzjoni Ewropea, fid-dawl ta' l-aġġustamenti li saru għat-test tal-Karta minn dik il-Konvenzjoni (partikolarment fl-Artikoli (51 U 52) u ta' l-evoluzzjoni fil-liġi ta' l-Unjoni. Għalkemm dawn l-ispjegazzjonijiet m'għandhomx fihom infushom l-istatus ta' liġi, huma mezz siewi ta' interpretazzjoni intiż sabiex ikunu ċċarati d-dispożizzjonijiet tal-Karta.
  • Lis, Lancet and Chemielewski v. Regional Court in Warsaw and others
    Decision date:
    Deciding body type:
    National Court/Tribunal
    Deciding body:
    High Court of Justice - Queen's Bench Division - Administrative Court
    Type:
    Decision
    Policy area:
    Justice, freedom and security, Asylum and migration
    ECLI (European case law identifier):
  • F. F. (F. F.), N. P. (N. P.) ir A. P. (A. P.),. v. Migration Department under the Ministry of Interior of the Republic of Lithuania (Migracijos departamentas prie Lietuvos Respublikos vidaus reikalų ministerijos)
    Decision date:
    Deciding body type:
    National Court/Tribunal
    Deciding body:
    Supreme Administrative Court of Lithuania
    Type:
    Decision
    Policy area:
    Justice, freedom and security
    ECLI (European case law identifier):
  • Criminal proceedings against Emil Milev
    Decision date:
    Deciding body type:
    Court of Justice of the European Union
    Deciding body:
    Court (First Chamber)
    Type:
    Decision
    Policy area:
    Justice, freedom and security
    ECLI (European case law identifier):
    ECLI:EU:C:2018:732
  • UBS Europe SE and Alain Hondequin and Others v DV and Others
    Decision date:
    Deciding body type:
    Court of Justice of the European Union
    Deciding body:
    Court (Fifth Chamber)
    Type:
    Decision
    Policy area:
    Economic and monetary affairs
    ECLI (European case law identifier):
    ECLI:EU:C:2018:715
  • UBS Europe SE and Alain Hondequin and Others v DV and Others
    Decision date:
    Deciding body type:
    Court of Justice of the European Union
    Deciding body:
    Advocate General
    Type:
    Opinion
    Policy area:
    Economic and monetary affairs
    ECLI (European case law identifier):
  • Nap Innova Hoteles SL contre Conseil de résolution unique (CRU)
    Decision date:
    Deciding body type:
    Court of Justice of the European Union
    Deciding body:
    Court (Ninth Chamber)
    Type:
    Decision
    Policy area:
    External relations
    ECLI (European case law identifier):
    ECLI:EU:C:2018:546
  • Criminal proceedings against Nikolay Kolev and Others.
    Decision date:
    Deciding body type:
    Court of Justice of the European Union
    Deciding body:
    Court (Grand Chamber)
    Type:
    Decision
    Policy area:
    Justice, freedom and security
    ECLI (European case law identifier):
    ECLI:EU:C:2018:392
  • Alexandru Firicel raised a constitutional complaint (excepție de neconstituționalitate).
    Decision date:
    Deciding body type:
    National Court/Tribunal
    Deciding body:
    Constitutional Court
    Type:
    Decision
    Policy area:
    Justice, freedom and security
    ECLI (European case law identifier):
  • Correia de Matos v. Portugal
    Decision date:
    Deciding body type:
    European Court of Human Rights
    Deciding body:
    Court (Grand Chamber)
    Type:
    Decision
    Policy area:
    Justice, freedom and security
    ECLI (European case law identifier):
    ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0404JUD005640212
  • Russian citizien v Federal state Bremen
    Decision date:
    Deciding body type:
    National Court/Tribunal
    Deciding body:
    Federal Administrative Court
    Type:
    Decision
    Policy area:
    Justice, freedom and security
    ECLI (European case law identifier):
    ECLI:DE:BVerwG:2018:270318U1A4.17.0

0 results found

0 results found

0 results found

0 results found