You are here:

Članak 52 - Opseg i tumačenje prava i načela

1. Svako ograničenje pri ostvarivanju prava i sloboda priznatih ovom Poveljom mora biti predviñeno zakonom i mora poštovati bit tih prava i sloboda. Uz poštovanje načela proporcionalnosti, ograničenja su moguća samo ako su potrebna i ako zaista odgovaraju ciljevima od općeg interesa koje priznaje Unija ili potrebi zaštite prava i sloboda drugih osoba. 2. Prava koja priznaje ova Povelja i koja su predviñena u Ugovorima ostvaruju se pod uvjetima i u granicama ovlasti odreñenih tim Ugovorima. 3. U onoj mjeri u kojoj ova Povelja sadrži prava koja odgovaraju pravima zajamčenima Konvencijom za zaštitu ljudskih prava i temeljnih sloboda, značenje i opseg primjene tih prava jednaki su onima iz spomenute Konvencije. Ova odredba ne sprječava pravo Unije da pruži širu zaštitu. 4. U mjeri u kojoj Povelja prepoznaje temeljna prava kako proizlaze iz ustavnih tradicija zajedničkih državama članicama, ta prava se tumače u skladu s tim tradicijama. 5. Odredbe ove Povelje koje sadržavaju načela mogu biti provedene zakonodavnim i izvršnim aktima institucija, tijela, ureda i agencija Unije te aktima država članica dok u izvršavanju svojih ovlasti provode pravo Unije. One su u sudskoj nadležnosti samo u tumačenju tih akata te u presudama o njihovoj zakonitosti. 6. Nacionalni zakoni i prakse se u cijelosti uzimaju u obzir kako je odreñeno ovom Poveljom. 7. Sudovi Unije i država članica uzimaju u obzir objašnjenja sastavljena kao smjernice za tumačenje ove Povelje.

  • Estonia / Supreme Court, Criminal Law Chamber / 3-1-1-48-12
    Raivo Paala v Estonia
    Decision date:
    30 May 2012
    Deciding body type:
    National Court/Tribunal
    Deciding body:
    Criminal Law Chamber of the Supreme Court
    Type:
    Decision
    Policy area:
    Fight against fraud
    Taxation
  • Austria / Constitutional Court / U466/11; U1836/11
    Two anonymised Chinese nationals v Austrian Asylum Court (Asylgerichtshof)
    Decision date:
    14 Mar 2012
    Deciding body type:
    National Court/Tribunal
    Deciding body:
    Austria / Constitutional Court
    Type:
    Decision
    Policy area:
    Justice, freedom and security
    Asylum and migration
    ECLI (European case law identifier):
    ECLI:AT:VFGH:2012:U466.2011
  • Austria / Asylum Court / C8 263654-0/2008
    Asylum seeker from China v Austria
    Decision date:
    12 Mar 2012
    Deciding body type:
    National Court/Tribunal
    Deciding body:
    Austria / Asylum Court
    Type:
    Decision
    Policy area:
    Justice, freedom and security
    Asylum and migration
  • Austria / Asylum Court / D19 423919-1/2012/2E, D19 423918-1/2012-2E
    Asylum seekers from Russia/Chechnya v Federal Asylum Office
    Decision date:
    27 Jan 2012
    Deciding body type:
    National Court/Tribunal
    Deciding body:
    Austria / Asylum Court
    Type:
    Decision
    Policy area:
    Justice, freedom and security
    Asylum and migration
  • Romania / Constitutional Court / 116D/2011, 374D/2011
    Horia Ciorcilă and Radu Jurcovan / Claudiu Eugen Iuliu Silaghi, Doina Mărioara Cojocaru and Sergiu Dan Dascăl
    Decision date:
    25 Jan 2012
    Deciding body type:
    National Court/Tribunal
    Deciding body:
    Romania / The Romanian Constitutional Court
    Type:
    Decision
    Policy area:
    Justice, freedom and security
  • CJEU - Joined cases C 468/10 and C 469/10 / Judgment
    Asociación Nacional de Establecimientos Financieros de Crédito (ASNEF), Federación de Comercio Electrónico y Marketing Directo (FECEMD) v Administración del Estado
    Decision date:
    24 Nov 2011
    Deciding body type:
    Court of Justice of the European Union
    Deciding body:
    European Court of Justice (Third Chamber)
    Type:
    Decision
  • CJEU - C 163/10 / Judgment
    Aldo Patricello
    Decision date:
    06 Nov 2011
    Deciding body type:
    Court of Justice of the European Union
    Deciding body:
    European Court of Justice (Grand Chamber)
    Type:
    Decision
  • Austria / Supreme Administrative Court / 6Ob63/11z
    Right to informational self-determination, Dr. M.H. appeal against order of lower court
    Decision date:
    14 Sep 2011
    Deciding body type:
    National Court/Tribunal
    Deciding body:
    Supreme Administrative Court
    Type:
    Decision
    Policy area:
    Economic and monetary affairs
    Enterprise
    ECLI (European case law identifier):
    ECLI:AT:OGH0002:2011:0060OB00063.11Z.0914.000
  • Italy / Tribunale di Firenze, Sezione Lavoro / 2940 R.G.
    Maternity benefits for stateless person
    Decision date:
    09 Aug 2011
    Deciding body type:
    National Court/Tribunal
    Deciding body:
    Court of Firenze, Employment Section
    Type:
    Decision
  • Portugal / Tribunal Constitucional / Judgment 97/2011
    Scope of article 78a (1) of the Constitutional Court Act
    Decision date:
    09 Feb 2011
    Deciding body type:
    National Court/Tribunal
    Deciding body:
    Constitutional Court
    Type:
    Decision

30 results found

0 results found

0 results found

0 results found