eu-charter

EU Charter of Fundamental Rights

Article 48 - Presumption of innocence and right of defence

Article 48 - Presumption of innocence and right of defence

1. Everyone who has been charged shall be presumed innocent until proved guilty according to law.
2. Respect for the rights of the defence of anyone who has been charged shall be guaranteed.

    • Text:

      Article 48 is the same as Article 6(2) and (3) of the ECHR, which reads as follows:

      "2. Everyone charged with a criminal offence shall be presumed innocent until proved guilty according to law.

      3. Everyone charged with a criminal offence has the following minimum rights:

      (a) to be informed promptly, in a language which he understands and in detail, of the nature and cause of the accusation against him;
      (b) to have adequate time and facilities for the preparation of his defence;
      (c) to defend himself in person or through legal assistance of his own choosing or, if he has not sufficient means to pay for legal assistance, to be given it free when the interests of justice so require;
      (d) to examine or have examined witnesses against him and to obtain the attendance and examination of witnesses on his behalf under the same conditions as witnesses against him;
      (e) to have the free assistance of an interpreter if he cannot understand or speak the language used in court."

      In accordance with Article 52(3), this right has the same meaning and scope as the right guaranteed by the ECHR.

      Source:
      Official Journal of the European Union C 303/17 - 14.12.2007
      Preamble - Explanations relating to the Charter of Fundamental Rights:
      These explanations were originally prepared under the authority of the Praesidium of the Convention which drafted the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union. Although they do not as such have the status of law, they are a valuable tool of interpretation intended to clarify the provisions of the Charter.
    • Renos Neofytou v Attorney General of the Republic
      Decision date:
      Deciding body type:
      National Court/Tribunal
      Deciding body:
      Supreme Court, Appeal Jurisdiction
      Type:
      Decision
      Policy area:
      Justice, freedom and security
      ECLI (European case law identifier):
    • Xellia Pharmaceuticals ApS and Alpharma, LLC, formerly Zoetis Products LLC v European Commission
      Decision date:
      Deciding body type:
      Court of Justice of the European Union
      Deciding body:
      General Court (Ninth Chamber)
      Type:
      Decision
      Policy area:
      Public Health
      ECLI (European case law identifier):
      ECLI:EU:T:2016:460
    • Generics (UK) v. Commission
      Decision date:
      Deciding body type:
      Court of Justice of the European Union
      Deciding body:
      GENERAL COURT (Ninth Chamber)
      Type:
      Decision
      Policy area:
      Competition
      ECLI (European case law identifier):
      ECLI:EU:T:2016:454
    • Merck v. Commission
      Decision date:
      Deciding body type:
      Court of Justice of the European Union
      Deciding body:
      GENERAL COURT (Ninth Chamber)
      Type:
      Decision
      Policy area:
      Competition
      ECLI (European case law identifier):
      ECLI:EU:T:2016:452
    • H. Lundbeck and Others v. European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industries and Associations
      Decision date:
      Deciding body type:
      Court of Justice of the European Union
      Deciding body:
      GENERAL COURT (Ninth Chamber)
      Type:
      Decision
      Policy area:
      Competition
      ECLI (European case law identifier):
      ECLI:EU:T:2016:449
    • Criminal Proceedings against Atanas Ognyanov
      Decision date:
      Deciding body type:
      Court of Justice of the European Union
      Deciding body:
      Court (Grand Chamber)
      Type:
      Decision
      Policy area:
      Justice, freedom and security
      ECLI (European case law identifier):
      ECLI:EU:C:2016:514
    • Kristian Bekefi et al v The Republic of Cyprus through the Minister of the Interior
      Decision date:
      Deciding body type:
      National Court/Tribunal
      Deciding body:
      Supreme Court, Appeal Jurisdiction
      Type:
      Decision
      Policy area:
      ECLI (European case law identifier):
    • 1. la société anonyme ... S.A., ..., et 2. Monsieur ... ..., ..., et consorts contre un arrêt de la Cour administrative
      Decision date:
      Deciding body type:
      National Court/Tribunal
      Deciding body:
      Luxembourg Administrative Court
      Type:
      Decision
      Policy area:
      ECLI (European case law identifier):
    • Openbaar Ministerie v. Paweł Dworzecki
      Decision date:
      Deciding body type:
      Court of Justice of the European Union
      Deciding body:
      Advocate General
      Type:
      Opinion
      Policy area:
      Justice, freedom and security
      ECLI (European case law identifier):
      ECLI:EU:C:2016:333
    • Pál Aranyosi and Robert Căldăraru v Generalstaatsanwaltschaft Bremen
      Decision date:
      Deciding body type:
      Court of Justice of the European Union
      Deciding body:
      Court (Grand Chamber)
      Type:
      Decision
      Policy area:
      Justice, freedom and security
      ECLI (European case law identifier):
      ECLI:EU:C:2016:198

    0 results found

    0 results found

    0 results found