Online terrorist content is a threat to fundamental rights, rule of law and democracy. EU measures to tackle such content aim to prevent terrorism while upholding these values. FRA’s report looks at how online terrorist content is detected and removed under EU legislation. It highlights challenges in interpreting rules, risks of over-removal and potential impacts on freedom of expression. It finds that moderation practices by authorities and platforms can disproportionately affect certain groups, such as Muslims and Arabic speakers, while far-right content often receives less scrutiny. The findings, based on research and expert interviews with those addressing online terrorist content, offer ways to improve transparency in content moderation and to better balance public security and fundamental rights, contributing to wider debates on regulating online content responsibly.
Terora akti ir nopietns drauds cilvēku dzīvībai un drošībai, kā arī ievērojams drošības apdraudējums valstīm. Tajā pašā laikā pretterorisma tiesību akti, politika un citi pasākumi var tieši vai netieši radīt nopietnus pamattiesību ierobežojumus un var nelabvēlīgi ietekmēt indivīdus, grupas un sabiedrību kopumā. Šajā kopsavilkumā ir izklāstīti galvenie FRA konstatējumi no tās ziņojuma par Direktīvu (ES) 2017/541 par terorisma apkarošanu, kas ir galvenais krimināltiesību instruments ES līmenī terorisma apkarošanas jomā.
This report examines the EU’s main criminal law instrument in the field of counter-terrorism, Directive (EU) 2017/541. Specifically, it considers how the directive engages issues of fundamental rights, affecting individuals, groups and society as a whole.
This paper presents statistical survey data for the EU on how often people are stopped by the police, in what kind of situations they are stopped, the action taken by the police during stops, and views on whether or not the police acted respectfully.
This paper presents people’s concerns and experiences relating to security. It covers worry about crime, including terrorism and online fraud; experience of online fraud; experience of cyberharassment; and concern about illegal access to data.
Šajā ziņojumā ir izklāstīti galvenie konstatējumi, kas sniegti FRA otrajā pētījumā par ebreju
izcelsmes cilvēku pieredzi attiecībā uz naida noziegumiem, diskrimināciju un antisemītismu
Eiropas Savienībā — lielākajā no pasaulē jebkad veiktajiem pētījumiem par ebreju
izcelsmes cilvēkiem.
This Opinion aims to inform the European Parliament’s position on the legislative proposal for a Regulation on preventing the dissemination of terrorist content online, presented by the European Commission on 12 September 2018.
This report outlines the main findings of FRA’s second survey on Jewish people’s experiences with hate crime, discrimination and antisemitism in the European Union – the biggest survey of Jewish people ever conducted worldwide. Covering 12 EU Member States, the survey reached almost 16,500 individuals who identify as being Jewish. It follows up on the agency’s first survey, conducted in seven countries in 2012.
Šajā ceļvedī ir paskaidrots, kas ir profilēšana, kāds ir tās tiesiskais regulējums un kāpēc profilēšana ir gan nepieciešama, lai ievērotu pamattiesības, gan būtiska efektīvai policijas darbībai un robežu pārvaldībai. Ceļvedī ir sniegti arī praktiski norādījumi par to, kā novērst nelikumīgu profilēšanu policijas un robežu pārvaldības operācijās.
Report / Paper / Summary22January2026
Report / Paper / Summary18November2021
